O impacto da sociologia: cultura de citações e modelos científicos / The impact of sociology: citation culture and scientific models

Antonio da Silveira Brasil Jr.; Lucas Correia Carvalho

doi:10.20336/rbs.700

Autores

Antonio da Silveira Brasil Jr. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8653-668X
Lucas Correia Carvalho Universidade Federal Fluminense http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0118-7762

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.700

Resumo

O artigo discute alguns dos problemas envolvidos na utilização de métricas tradicionais de impacto da produção científica quando aplicadas às ciências sociais e, sobretudo, à sociologia. Aliando técnicas cientométricas com a abordagem sociológica, analisamos algumas das variáveis que permitem problematizar o uso universal dessas métricas, chamando a atenção para as especificidades das áreas do conhecimento e dos diferentes contextos científicos nacionais. Em perspectiva comparada, o artigo sugere que 1) artigos de um mesmo contexto nacional tendem a um perfil próximo de citação (“culturas de citação”); 2) temáticas relacionadas a questões nacionais não é um padrão exclusivo da sociologia brasileira.

Abstract

The article discusses some of the problems involved in using traditional metrics of impact of scientific production when applied to social sciences and, above all, to sociology. Combining scientometric techniques with the sociological approach, we analyzed some of the variables that make it possible to problematize the universal use of these metrics, drawing attention to the specificities of the areas of knowledge and the different national scientific contexts. In a comparative perspective, the article suggests that 1) articles from the same national context tend to have a close citation profile (“citation cultures”); 2) themes related to national issues are not an exclusive pattern of Brazilian sociology.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Antonio da Silveira Brasil Jr., Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Professor Adjunto do Departamento de Sociologia e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia e Antropologia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Editor de Sociologia & Antropologia. Jovem Cientista do Nosso Estado (JCNE/Faperj).

Lucas Correia Carvalho, Universidade Federal Fluminense

Professor Adjunto do Departamento de Sociologia e Metodologia em Ciências Sociais e do Programa de Pós-graduação em Sociologia da Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF).

Referências

Alatas, Syed F. (2016). Academic Dependency and the Global Division of Labour in the Social Sciences: Current Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921030516003

Are 90% of academic papers really never cited? Reviewing the literature on academic citations. (2014, abril 23). Recuperado 11 de maio de 2020, de site da Impact of Social Sciences: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/04/23/academic-papers-citation-rates-remler/

Armer, J. Michael (1987). Provincialism and Internationalism in Contemporary American Sociology. International Sociology, 2(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858098700200308

Armer, J. Michael (1990). The Deparochialization of American Sociology. In Sven Groennings, & David Wiley (eds.) Group Portrait: Internationalizing the Disciplines. (pp. 228-239). New York: American Forum, ERIC.

Barabási, Albert-László, Song, Chaoming, & Wang, Dashun (2012). Handful of papers dominates citation. Nature, 491(7422), 40–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/491040ª

Beigel, Fernanda (2018, setembro 5). Las relaciones de poder en la ciencia mundial. Un anti-ranking para conocer la ciencia producida en la periferia [Blog]. Recuperado 21 de junho de 2020, de site da SciELO en Perspectiva: https://blog.scielo.org/es/2018/09/05/las-relaciones-de-poder-en-la-ciencia-mundial-un-anti-ranking-para-conocer-la-ciencia-producida-en-la-periferia/

Boyack, Kevin W., & Klavans, Richard (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389–2404.

Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos - CGEE (2020). Diagnóstico das Ciências Humanas, Sociais Aplicadas, Linguística, Letras e Artes (CHSSALLA) no Brasil. Recuperado de https://www.cgee.org.br/documents/10195/734063/CGEE-2020-CHSSALLA.pdf

Ferreira, Elisabete, Führ, Fabiane, Lima, Karolayne C.R. de, Araújo, Paula Carina de, & Pereira, Suzana Z. (2015). Digital Object Identifier (DOI): o que é, para que serve, como se usa? AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento, 4(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v4i1.42369

Garfield, Eugene (1976). Significant journals of science. Nature, 264(5587), 609–615. https://doi.org/10.1038/264609a0

Hammarfelt, Björn (2016). Beyond Coverage: Toward a Bibliometrics for the Humanities. In Michael Ochsner, Sven E. Hug, & Hans-Dieter Daniel (orgs.), Research Assessment in the Humanities: Towards Criteria and Procedures (p. 115–131). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_10

Harzing, Anne-Wil, & Alakangas, Satu (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9

Hermes-Lima, Marcelo, & Gordon, Cesar (2020, janeiro 13). O baixo impacto das publicações brasileiras de sociologia. Recuperado 6 de maio de 2020, de site da Gazeta do Povo: https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/educacao/o-baixo-impacto-das-publicacoes-brasileiras-de-sociologia/

Hicks, Diana, Wouters, Paul, Waltman, Ludo, de Rijcke, Sarah, & Rafols, Ismael (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature News, 520(7548), 429. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

Kurien, Prema (2016). Sociology in America or a Sociology of America. ISA.e-Forum, 6.

Leydesdorff, Loet, & Milojević, Staša (2015). The Citation Impact of German Sociology Journals: Some Problems with the Use of Scientometric Indicators in Journal and Research Evaluations (SSRN Scholarly Paper No ID 2541908). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2541908

Martín-Martín, Alberto, Thelwall, Mike, Orduna-Malea, Enrique, & López-Cózar, Emilio D. (2020). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. arXiv:2004.14329 [cs]. Recuperado de http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14329

Merton, Robert K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56

Moksony, Ferenc, Hegedűs, Rita, & Császár, Melinda (2014). Rankings, research styles, and publication cultures: a study of American sociology departments. Scientometrics, 101(3), 1715–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1218-y

Mongeon, Philippe, & Paul-Hus, Adèle (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Santoro, Marco (2008). Putting Bourdieu in the Global Field. Introduction to the Symposium. Sociologica, (2/2008). https://doi.org/10.2383/27719

Sapiro, Gisèle, & Bustamante, Mauricio (2009). Translation as a Measure of International Consecration. Mapping the World Distribution of Bourdieu’s Books in Translation. Sociologica, (2-3/2009). https://doi.org/10.2383/31374

Sivertsen, Gunnar, & Larsen, Birger (2012). Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: an empirical analysis of the potential. Scientometrics, 91(2), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0615-3

Stephan, Paula, Veugelers, Reinhilde, & Wang, Jian (2017). Reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics. Nature, 544- Comment, 411-412. Recuperado 6 de maio de 2020, de https://www.nature.com/news/reviewers-are-blinkered-by-bibliometrics-1.21877

Strehl, Letícia (2005). O fator de impacto do ISI e a avaliação da produção científica: aspectos conceituais e metodológicos. Ciência da Informação, 34(1).

Velez-Cuartas, Gabriel, Lucio-Arias, Diana, & Leydesdorff, Loet (2015). Regional and Global Science: Latin American and Caribbean publications in the SciELO Citation Index and the Web of Science. arXiv:1510.02453 [cs]. Recuperado de http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02453

Vianna, Luiz W., Carvalho, Maria Alice R. de, Melo, Manuel P.C., & Burgos, Marcelo B. (1998). Doutores e Teses em Ciências Sociais. Dados, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52581998000300001

Visser, Martijn, van Eck, Nees J. & Waltman, Ludo (2020). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. arXiv:2005.10732 [cs]. Recuperado de http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10732

Wang, Dashun, Song, Chaoming, & Barabási, Albert-László (2013). Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact. Science, 342(6154), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237825

Werneck Vianna, Luiz, Carvalho, Maria Alice R. de, & Melo, Manuel P. C. (1994). Cientistas sociais e vida pública: o estudante de graduação em ciências sociais. Dados, 37(3).